Backwaters is on in full flow and there has hardly been any day or any night when I, and the sTrEAM Backwaters, of course, have not been thinking of the event, its sponsorship, logistics. Issues are as myriad as they come. There is this need to get the maximum out of the sources of funds and at the same time, decide where you want to draw the line between going out for more funds and managing the operations with whatever you have. There is the task of talking to various college committees for funds, which is a bit of a pain despite the helpful initiatives by the people. It seems as if everyone is laughing at us behind our backs and we have become a pitiable stock with every gossip centered on the next level to which the Backwaters committee has fallen to get funds.
The elections to Placement committee, in fact, was one of those times that the members of the Backwaters committee got a good verbal thrashing. Everyone, who had the opportunity, made the most out of it and came out with explicit opinions as to the nature of affairs. Nilanjan said that he had come forward to get Backwaters out of the mess when asked about what he has done for the batch, and there was Mayank who seemed to know all the means that the committe has been adopting in getting the brand IIMK higher (including us supposedly asking for pathetically small amounts from local shopkeepers...did I hear anyone say 250 bucks from Mezbaan...comeon, we haven't fallen that much).
All this is frustrating, especially when I know that there is more than meets the eye in this case...and that it is not possible to tell all without destroying a few reputations, straining a few relationships...and I have had my fill of those...not any more, at least not for as long as I can avoid.
The other concerns are many, too. There is the need to keep the team together. Despite the excellent way in which the team has come together so far, and the way we keep smiling through the odds against us, there can be moments-a-dozen where the things might just be a little too much to handle. I must say that I am dreading the arrival of those moments but as of now, things are as well as they could have been.
Designing and maintaining the online games for Backwaters has given me more sleepless nights than any thing else that I have got myself into at any point in time. With a sleep debt (Pavan might not agree to this) of more than ten days, I had to miss six hours of classes one fine Monday. With a difficult deadline and an even more difficult sourcing of questions, we had to beat all standard practices by launching the games with the most minimal of testing, often causing blunders and technical problems that were, to put in a word, embarassing.
At the same time, there have been so many people who have volunteered and helped that it is hard to repay them for all that they have done in words. It has been because of them that we were able to meet the deadline and do a decent, if not a great job. More than the amount or level of work they might have done, what really touched me was their willingness to put in time and effort at something that they were not really duty bound to do. We, as part of the Backwaters Committee, however, were supposed to do all that and more, and I believe that even though we may succeed in carrying off Backwaters with some style finally, we would have failed...failed not in making Backwaters happen...but failed in meeting our own expectations.
Besides Backwaters, there have been a host of other things happening on campus. Yash, Raul and gang did a great job with Arthanomics, the finance seminar at IIMK. With the list of speakers reading like the Who's Who of the Indian finance industry, I am sure that the Fin enthusiasts would have had a great time. I really regret having to miss most of the sessions of the Arthanomics weekend (though I did try to attend as many as I could) due to the Backwaters work, especially the online events work which was going live on Monday.
Another event that came and went without much ado was the re-elections for the Student Council and for the Placement Committee. The last time I wrote about elections, it created such a big hue and cry that I had to actually take the post down. This time, I am sure that not many would even bother to read what I think of the elections, and thankfully so...not because I want to create a scandal or wanted to do that the first time, for that matter...for I still think that the situation has not changed much from what it was a few months ago.
It is actually sad to see that even in a supposedly intelligent society like an IIM, popularity and appeal get more prominence compared to real work, talent, and suitability for job. I know that many might not agree to me and that this is what makes democracy what it is, but I would still say that the reason people lose or win elections, even in a society representing the intelligentsia, is absolutely meaningless and has got nothing to do with what they are capable of doing or what they may have done in the past.
More than that, the King Makers continued to rule, though the nature of their rule and influence has undergone a major change. They no longer exert an overt influence but there is a more covert appeal that goes out, a canvassing that is more felt than heard...but that is how a democracy operates, I guess...no rights or wrongs, just going where the herd goes. The only thing that pinches a little is the future of the big talks that we keep throwing and accepting about the pathetic state of Indian democracy and the rampant corruption. If this is how we are going to deal with it ourselves, I am not really clear about what we might do on the road ahead for the society and country at large.
At the same time, there have been so many people who have volunteered and helped that it is hard to repay them for all that they have done in words. It has been because of them that we were able to meet the deadline and do a decent, if not a great job. More than the amount or level of work they might have done, what really touched me was their willingness to put in time and effort at something that they were not really duty bound to do. We, as part of the Backwaters Committee, however, were supposed to do all that and more, and I believe that even though we may succeed in carrying off Backwaters with some style finally, we would have failed...failed not in making Backwaters happen...but failed in meeting our own expectations.
Besides Backwaters, there have been a host of other things happening on campus. Yash, Raul and gang did a great job with Arthanomics, the finance seminar at IIMK. With the list of speakers reading like the Who's Who of the Indian finance industry, I am sure that the Fin enthusiasts would have had a great time. I really regret having to miss most of the sessions of the Arthanomics weekend (though I did try to attend as many as I could) due to the Backwaters work, especially the online events work which was going live on Monday.
Another event that came and went without much ado was the re-elections for the Student Council and for the Placement Committee. The last time I wrote about elections, it created such a big hue and cry that I had to actually take the post down. This time, I am sure that not many would even bother to read what I think of the elections, and thankfully so...not because I want to create a scandal or wanted to do that the first time, for that matter...for I still think that the situation has not changed much from what it was a few months ago.
It is actually sad to see that even in a supposedly intelligent society like an IIM, popularity and appeal get more prominence compared to real work, talent, and suitability for job. I know that many might not agree to me and that this is what makes democracy what it is, but I would still say that the reason people lose or win elections, even in a society representing the intelligentsia, is absolutely meaningless and has got nothing to do with what they are capable of doing or what they may have done in the past.
More than that, the King Makers continued to rule, though the nature of their rule and influence has undergone a major change. They no longer exert an overt influence but there is a more covert appeal that goes out, a canvassing that is more felt than heard...but that is how a democracy operates, I guess...no rights or wrongs, just going where the herd goes. The only thing that pinches a little is the future of the big talks that we keep throwing and accepting about the pathetic state of Indian democracy and the rampant corruption. If this is how we are going to deal with it ourselves, I am not really clear about what we might do on the road ahead for the society and country at large.
9 comments:
well, like to make a few clarifications:
1. the placecomm elections was not intended to be used as an oppurtunity to trash the Backwaters committee. it so happened that one of the backwaters committee member decided to stand for the placecomm elections and the questions posed to her were taken as if the backwaters were being questioned.
2. she mentioned about branding of IIMK, this and that..the normal crap.
as a voter, i was perfectly justified in asking her contributions to Backwaters. When she had an opportunity to brand The mangagement event of IIMK and to help us earn brownie points, she had let go of this golden oppurtunity.
3. It pains to see other lesser B-schools getting corporate sponsorship for their events and we cant even get one? all fair, if we had tried and failed.
4. nitai, accept it.. . ask any one on the campus regarding the mail u send with the subject "All about money" for their fair opinion on the same.
5. on a lighter note. u say,"comeon, we haven't fallen that much." so how much have we fallen ?
I won't reply to this post of yours, not because I don't have answers. I could equally well, if not better, write a point-by-point rejoinder but then again, doesn't serve any purpose...
hmmm..interesting.. a reply to a comment stating "i wont reply to this comment".
then why put in that comment ???
sounds pretty lame to me.
and most of mayank's points seem valid. and if u have answers, tell them.
"doesnt serve any purpose" is an excuse that is even older than "it was just a spoof".
Why the comment...the only reason in my mind both while writing the post as well as the reply to the comment was to make the silliness of it all obvious.
I said that it does not serve the purpose becaue if I had replied in a similar fashion as the comment, I would have been just adding fuel to fire where there had never been any smoke.
To put it bluntly, for people who do not know what went on behind the scenes, it is very easy to raise fingers (as it is in any democratic setup, I believe) but very difficult to appreciate the reasons and/or justifications for the same...and as such, it wouldn't serve the purpose of resolving the concerns Mayank had or you have, even if I do give the reasons for why I wrote what I wrote and why I think what Mayank wrote has been written without acknowledging what really went on.
if there was any justification or explanation, it should be provided not brushed under the carpet.
and saying that there is not even smoke is just an ostrich-like attempt to bury ur head in the sand and believe that there really is no problem.
the moment you or anyone else steps up to take a public role, they are bound by many norms, one of the most basic being transparency and accountability to the stakeholders, in this case the entire batch.
a member of the backwaters comm stands for election to another comm HAS to answer questions regarding their contribution to the batch and to TEAM Backwaters. How else do u expect the voters to judge and decide?
As far as wht mayank said in the election is concerned, stating that he did not acknowledge what happened in the background is akin to saying 'hey, dont point fingers at us, u dont know wht we have to do'
something that our dear old placecom keeps saying and getting berated for. tho i m happy that in recent times this tendency has been replaced by a resolve to take the batch along in any decision they take. i wish other ppl were as professional.
and btw: ur reply to my reply to ur reply to mayank's reply to ur post did not make sense once again. thats twice in a row. Food for thought ???
well, at that point i had made clarifications.
but now i have some doubts, which i think you would be more forthcoming in reply to:
1. "the only reason in my mind ... was to make the silliness of it all obvious". could you please explain silliness of what ? and how did you succeed (if u think u have) or how had you intended to succeed.
2. "I would have been just adding fuel to fire where there had never been any smoke". at the same time u said, "I had firmly decided to be just a bystander and let things take their own course". arent the two contradictory ?
3. how can i appreciate the reasons and/or justifications if i do not know what has happened behind the scenes. as in a democratic setup (i hope i am not dealing with an indian democratic setup here in IIMK), the representatives are accountable to the stakeholders. if for reasons you cant put them here, we can always discuss it offline. but lets then have a healthy discussion.
may be then it would serve the purpose of resolving the concerns i have or adi has, if u do give the reasons for why u wrote what u wrote and why u think what i wrote has been written without acknowledging what really went on.
Once again and that too just because you guys have taken so much trouble to write sub-blogs at MY blog space :), I would say that the whole thing about other people knowing everything and more than that, commenting at will about what has been happening in Backwaters is silly.
Mayank, I am not saying, not even for a second that nothing happened but the way it was tackled at the Placecom elections was absolutely unethical and unseemly.
Similarly Adi, it is not just about pointing fingers...it is about making baseless allegations without any attempt to verify the authenticity of what happened. If this is, as Mayank says, any different from Indian democracy, I would seriously expect at least this decency and respect for a body that you guys have elected by your selves.
Moreover, it was not a questioning session by the voters of the backwaters committee and not a platform where it ought to have been done. If there were any replies to be given by the backwaters committee to the allegations/accusations, the placecom elections were no place to ask for or offer the same. As a voter, the ideal questions should have dealt with the candidate's suitability for the post she was contesting for, not raising questions on what she, as a part of some other team, had done for some other committee.
Adi and Mayank, we have the answers right now and we had the answers then, as well (in fact, Saurabh had to be restrained from giving a reply to Mayank's comment about building brand IIMK). But unlike you guys, we could not open up our big mouths and speak out of context...that was a conscious decision that I and others at Backwaters team took at that time and we stand by it even now. When the time and context comes, we will definitely have the discussion as to what went wrong and how accountable we are for the same.
As for this platform of discussion, even in the past I have not shied away from discussing any and every thing on this blog and neither will I do so in the future.
1.Who decides what is ethical?
2. What is unseemly about raising doubts that a person has and seekign clarifications about the same?
3. Where was the baseless allegation in asking what a person has contributed to his/her present role? No one claimed that he/she did not do anything or was useless, did they?
4."You guys have elected by your selves"? Arent you a part of US?
5. Where is the disrespect in demanding to know why we should give our vote to someone?
6. Its immaterial what session it was. It was a session to determine the suitability of a set of candidates for a particular, very important role, that everyone at IIMK has a stake in. Its pointless and counter-intuitive to ask someone how good they WILL be as a PlaceCom member, no one really can answer that, but common sense tells me that a good anchor point IS what the person has/has not done in their previous or current roles. Remember, it is the general attitude of the person that is what is usually gauged by such sessions, no their absolute capability since that can never be quantified in advance.
7. Why does Saurabh have to answer anything? We will ask him enough questions when the time comes. The question was posed to a particular person and that person should be competent/capable enough to answer it.
8. Why are you guys taking it as a slur upon the Backwaters com functioning? It was just a personal query about a person's contribution to a team task, thats all. No judgements are being passed upon you all. We still have time for that ;-)
9. Who cares what you stand by as of now? We wanted to know the stand of the candidate then.
10. As far as your blog is concerned, it rocks. Period.
phew !! the comments have certainly become longer than the blog :P maybe you should post it as a blog :D
well not much left to say as all the points have been covered by adi.
plz plz remember its always a loyal and concerned customer (in this case, well wisher) who bothers to take the pain of giving constructive feedback. so plz take it in that spirit.
hope to see you in the backwaters committe reelected!!!
Post a Comment